Please note--you should either email or share a Google Doc with me to turn in your first assignment. The information on the recently posted syllabus is not correct.
Due Dates:
Web 2.0 Application & Analysis report is due May 1, 2011.
Implementation Plan posting is due by May 1, 2011
Final implementation reflection is due by May 16, 2011
Asynchronous Participation:
Topic 1: Web 2.0 Tools Application & Analysis
·
Topic 2: Share Your Implementation Plan (Discussion Board)
· Clearly define your plans for implementation the use of a Web 2.0 tool, specifically addressing challenges, areas of success, and student gains
· Respond to classmates postings
Topic 3: Personal Reflection (Discussion Board)
· Reflect on you experiences implementing the use of your Web 2.0 resources
· Respond to classmates postings
Topic 4: Course exit surveys
· Viterbo survey
· Stephens Group survey
Assignments and Requirements:
Web 2.0 Tools: Application & Analysis25% of Overall Grade
Participants will identify a minimum of two Web 2.0 resources that assist classroom teachers as they work with Tier I Rti Interventions.
Prepare a one-page report for each tool with the following headers:
1. Url of the site and brief description of the tool.
2. Description, how this site can be adapted to the school setting; individual classroom setting, or any other relevant educational group.
3. Rationale why this specific site will assist students with special learning needs in the classroom setting and identify areas of Response to Intervention that using this site will address.
4. Include advantages and any cautions/preparation that might be needed when implementing the tool.
Work is to be of graduate quality.
Participation in Course Wiki Discussion Board50% of Overall Grade
Participants will be required to use the discussion board section of our class wiki to share their plan for implementing the use of a supportive Web 2.0 tool for a specific student. In the discussion please share the following information:
1. Give a brief description of the student’s situation, educational level, curricular area and explain specific learning needs (no names please).
2. Explain what Web 2.0 tool you plan to use with student and describe the implement plan addressing the following topics:
· How does it support your educational program
· Include a description of how the Web 2.0 tool can be adapted to the specific student needs
· Explain how the student will improve knowledge, class participation, performance and/or communication through this tool
Respond to classmate’s postings.
Personal Reflection25% of Overall Grade
Participants will write a reflection on their experiences in the use of Web 2.0 tools with their student(s) that have specific learning needs. Explain what tools you used and what student needs you were trying to address. How did using this tool address the RtI model?
(Remember no student names). Explain how implementation worked in the classroom including any challenges you encountered. Did the tool help improve student knowledge, class participation, performance and/or communication? If so, how? What evidence do you have to show this occurred? Respond to classmate’s postings.
Note: If a student's work cannot be handed in by May 16th this must be brought to the attention of the instructor and approved prior to the due date to prevent a lower grade. Circumstances beyond the control of the student will be considered on an individual basis.
Email: lind.tammy@gmail.com
Phone: 414.331.5294
Remember to post your discussions on this page!
Viterbo Syllabus---rubrics are located at the end of the document:
Please note--you should either email or share a Google Doc with me to turn in your first assignment. The information on the recently posted syllabus is not correct.
Due Dates:
Web 2.0 Application & Analysis report is due May 1, 2011.
Implementation Plan posting is due by May 1, 2011
Final implementation reflection is due by May 16, 2011
Asynchronous Participation:
Topic 1: Web 2.0 Tools Application & Analysis
·
Topic 2: Share Your Implementation Plan (Discussion Board)
· Clearly define your plans for implementation the use of a Web 2.0 tool, specifically addressing challenges, areas of success, and student gains
· Respond to classmates postings
Topic 3: Personal Reflection (Discussion Board)
· Reflect on you experiences implementing the use of your Web 2.0 resources
· Respond to classmates postings
Topic 4: Course exit surveys
· Viterbo survey
· Stephens Group survey
Assignments and Requirements:
Web 2.0 Tools: Application & Analysis 25% of Overall Grade
Participants will identify a minimum of two Web 2.0 resources that assist classroom teachers as they work with Tier I Rti Interventions.
Prepare a one-page report for each tool with the following headers:
1. Url of the site and brief description of the tool.
2. Description, how this site can be adapted to the school setting; individual classroom setting, or any other relevant educational group.
3. Rationale why this specific site will assist students with special learning needs in the classroom setting and identify areas of Response to Intervention that using this site will address.
4. Include advantages and any cautions/preparation that might be needed when implementing the tool.
Work is to be of graduate quality.
Participation in Course Wiki Discussion Board 50% of Overall Grade
Participants will be required to use the discussion board section of our class wiki to share their plan for implementing the use of a supportive Web 2.0 tool for a specific student. In the discussion please share the following information:
1. Give a brief description of the student’s situation, educational level, curricular area and explain specific learning needs (no names please).
2. Explain what Web 2.0 tool you plan to use with student and describe the implement plan addressing the following topics:
· How does it support your educational program
· Include a description of how the Web 2.0 tool can be adapted to the specific student needs
· Explain how the student will improve knowledge, class participation, performance and/or communication through this tool
Respond to classmate’s postings.
Personal Reflection 25% of Overall Grade
Participants will write a reflection on their experiences in the use of Web 2.0 tools with their student(s) that have specific learning needs. Explain what tools you used and what student needs you were trying to address. How did using this tool address the RtI model?
(Remember no student names). Explain how implementation worked in the classroom including any challenges you encountered. Did the tool help improve student knowledge, class participation, performance and/or communication? If so, how? What evidence do you have to show this occurred? Respond to classmate’s postings.
Evaluation Method:
100-93=A 92-91=A- 90-88=B+ 87-85=B 84-82=B- 81-78=C+ 77-75=C 74-70=C- 69-67=D+ 66-64=D
63-60= D- Lower that 60=F
Note: If a student's work cannot be handed in by May 16th this must be brought to the attention of the instructor and approved prior to the due date to prevent a lower grade. Circumstances beyond the control of the student will be considered on an individual basis.
http://www.zoomerang.com/ Survey/WEB22C2YSEPTRF/